![]() We’ve been featuring a lot of tapper games as of late, and PolitiCats happens to be one – you can only be as powerful as your tapping power is. You can also earn endorsements from Celebrity Cats, and gain more supporters who would be willing to part with their cash to help fund your campaign. You start out by creating a “cute, cuddly” cat candidate, and after that, you can work your way toward world domination by putting together a campaign team of “tiny” humans, starting out as class president and going as far as Supreme Earth Cat. is only a few months away, so why not try another politically-themed game in R2 Games’ PolitiCats? Unlike other recent games that have dumped on or parodied the likes of Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, and Bernie Sanders, this game doesn’t feature any human politicians, but rather feline ones. ![]() When pushed they never failed to run away like a little bitch trying to run from their stupid to focus on the horribleness of the current system.Election time in the U.S. Either they don't attempt to make an argument or their arguments look like a child explaining his dream that makes no sense what so ever. Thanks for playing.Ī government with direct democracy that would be made up of the working class. Private is the means of production.Īnd who oversees this Engel? Yes, yes, you win! The government. That is what a lot of people don't understand about communism is the different between personal property and private. And they will still own personal property such as houses,clothes,tv,etc. In the communist system the control all of the means of production. Oh wait they can do that in capitalist system too and own property. He is better than the serf because he can earn *puts glasses on* for survival. It is much better than being a wage-slave. Under communism the proletariat owns the factories, stores, etc. What is he gaining? The ability to earn and survive? No, the proletariat doesn't gain from his labor. ![]() How is it meaningless? It answers the question of what is communism? This is a completely meaningless statement but this is all Engel was capable of. If Trotsky had succeeded Lenin the history of the USSR would be very different. Lenin did plan to make some democratic changes once things were stabilized and Trotsky talks about them a lot in some of his writings after he was exiled. So democracy wouldn't have happened at all if the Reds had lost. The Civil War was still going on and the Reds were losing and if they lost then the Whites would have restored Tsar. I'll admit about a year after the Revolution, in 1918(I think), the policy of War Communism was implemented and Lenin did do some things that disagree with, however in the context of the Revolution it makes sense. Also the October Revolution did not occur until the Bolsheviks were the majority party in the Soviets and thus were representing the majority of the people. Secondly early on Lenin made some very democratic reforms such as granting workers control of the factories. In our society that class is the capitalist class. It refers to the class which holds power in society. Marx called the capitalist system of Europe a dictatorship of the bourgeois, even though some countries had Republics at that time. ![]() First of all the term "Dictatorship of the Proletariat" doesn't mean a dictatorship in the modern sense.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |